News

Homeopathy vs. Prozac

March 10, 2010
blog photo

A 2009 study in the journal Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine compared individualized homeopathy to the drug Prozac.  Ninety-one patients with moderate to severe depression were treated either with Prozac or by individualized homeopathy.  Neither the patient nor the doctor knew which treatment the patient received.

 

Over the eight weeks of the study, patients responded equally well to both treatments.  In other words, homeopathy was just as effective at reducing depression as Prozac.  In addition, the patients treated with homeopathy reported fewer troubling side effects, and they were significantly less likely to discontinue use of homeopathy due to side effects.

 

This is a great study for several reasons:

 

  • It meets one of the key “gold standards” for medical research: it is double-blinded.  Basically, each patient gave a complete medical history to a qualified homeopathic doctor.  The doctor identified what the correct homeopathic remedy was for that patient.  Then the patient randomly received either that remedy or Prozac.  Neither the patient nor the doctor knew which treatment was given.

Thus the results are highly objective.  They cannot be due to reporting bias, where the patient reports more favorably if he knows he’s taking one remedy or the other.  The results are also not attributable to the therapeutic relationship between the patient and doctor.  Homeopathy’s remarkable success is often written off by conventional doctors as the result of the homeopathic physician being so empathic and concerned about his patient.  It feels good to have someone actually take the time to listen to you!

 

  • It compares two different treatment approaches, rather than compare a treatment to placebo.  In the conventional placebo-controlled model, the treatment simply has to be better than nothing!  In this model, the treatment has to be better than the current standard of practice.  This comparative research model is gaining in popularity, as it helps physicians choose among available treatment options.

 

  • It demonstrates what every good homeopath knows:  Homeopathy is wonderful for treating depression, as well as a host of other conditions that destroy lives and stymie the best efforts of conventional medicine.

 

Read the abstract on Medline by following this link:

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19687192

 

 

 

Don't suffer from allergies this spring!

February 21, 2010
blog photo

Choose homeopathy for allergy relief 

If the snow and cold ever go away in Asheville, its citizens will celebrate -- until, they realize that allergy spring season is just around the corner! But allergies don’t have to control your life. Here is a quick lesson on allergies and their treatment from a homeopathic standpoint. I also present research from the medical literature that supports my experience.

Asheville is a bad place for people with allergies. The immense variety of plant life that lives in this mountainous southern region wreaks havoc on people whose immune systems can’t tell friend from foe. Even people who have never suffered from allergies develop them upon moving here.

Understanding allergies

What are allergies? Merriam-Webster defines an allergy as an “exaggerated or pathological immunological reaction (as by sneezing, difficult breathing, itching, or skin rashes) to substances, situations, or physical states that are without comparable effect on the average individual.” Basically, your body treats a harmless substance (like grass pollen) as if it is a danger (like a virus). It creates the same reaction as it would when you have an infection.

When you have an infection, the immune system can eliminate it and you feel better. When you are repeatedly exposed to an allergen, the symptoms persist. So you have two treatment options: eliminate the exposure (which is virtually impossible), or train the immune system not to react inappropriately.

Conventional medicines like antihistamines and inhaled steroids work by shutting the immune system down generally. They minimize the inappropriate function of the immune system, but they also inhibit the appropriate function of the immune system. They also tend to produce side effects which are generally nothing more than a nuisance, but can be dangerous in extreme cases.

Homeopathy and allergies

Everyone wants to know, “Is there a homeopathic remedy for allergies?” This is conventional medical thinking. There is not “a remedy” for allergies, but there is a remedy for each person with allergies.

For example, a person whose allergy symptoms include thick yellow nasal discharge that is much better when they are outdoors in cool weather might need the remedy Pulsatilla.   This person will tend to be gentle and emotional, warm-blooded, and thirstless. Her or his symptoms are likely to change frequently.

On the other hand, a person with a dry stuffy nose who feels better in hot humid weather will more likely respond to the remedy Nux vomica. This person will more likely be assertive and irritable, with a sensitive stomach and constipated.

There are a hundred other examples. I’ve personally cured people’s allergies with dozens of different remedies: Natrum muriaticum, Sabadilla, Kali bichromicum, Allium cepa, Sepia, Sulphur, Silica, Medorrhinum, etc.

Homeopathy has been practiced for two hundred years, and we still use the same remedies in the same way, based on the same indications. This is a system that has avoided constant overhaul for one simple reason: it works!

Medical research and homeopathy

There are a host of research studies that support the practice of homeopathy. Here are some that pertain to allergies. There is great debate among conventional researchers over the study design of homeopathic studies. Homeopathy does not lend itself well to placebo controls and double-blinding. I encourage you to read the studies for yourself. To me they are convincing. Perhaps that’s because I see their results duplicated in my practice day in and day out.

Colin (2006) reports on 105 cases of ear, nose and throat allergies treated homeopathically. Only two failed to respond and none deteriorated. Respiratory allergies were not as well-treated in this sampling, though many of the respiratory allergy sufferers did not return to the clinic for follow-up, so they had to be assumed to be treatment failures. Read the abstract at: Colin (2006).

Launso et al (2006) surveyed 88 patients who had consulted either a general practice medical doctor or a classical homeopath for allergies. Fifty-seven per cent of those under homeopathic care reported improvement in their health, while only 24% under conventional care reported improvement. Read: Launso et. al. (2006)

Goossens et al (2009) studied the effect of homeopathic treatment on allergic rhinitis (runny and stuffy nose). The reduction in symptoms was dramatic and significant across the population studied. Read: Goosens et. al. (2009)

What is it like to work with a homeopath?

Your experience with a homeopath will be very different from your visit with a primary care physician or allergist. First, the conventional doctor will spend little time with you. There is no need to learn much about your condition when the treatment options are so limited. You are almost certainly going to get a common antihistamine – a drug which blocks part of the immune reaction to an allergen.

An allergist will probably test you to see what it is you are allergic to. Then you will get an antihistamine and/or allergy shots specific to the type of allergen detected by the test. This at least individualizes care to some extent, but only to the extent that you identify your key allergen.  It does not take into account the entirety of your health.

A homeopathic visit involves a thorough examination of your health and health history. Each symptom is examined in detail. I want to know what makes your runny nose better or worse. What exactly does it feel like? When did it begin in the first place and why? What other symptoms or changes in your body come along with allergy season? 

Then I want to understand you as a person. What are your sensitivities? Are you hot or cold? Do you sleep well? What aggravates or annoys you? What soothes you? What causes you stress or ruins your day?

Homeopathic treatment also involves ongoing consultations to make sure the remedy prescribed actually works and that you continue to respond. The end goal of homeopathic treatment is to be disease-free and have little-to-no dependence on medication – including homeopathic medicine. The treatment should fix the problem, not just cover it up. 

You will tend to need more frequent care and repeated doses of the remedy early in the course of treatment. As the season goes by -- and as future seasons come and go – you will need the remedy less and less. This is real health care.

Don’t get caught in the (sick) crowd

People will line up to see their family practitioners and allergists this spring as they always do. They will continue to suffer, and to remain dependent on their allergy medications.   Try individualized homeopathic medicine this year and see what it feels like to conquer your allergies – to remain symptom-free this season, and for seasons to come.

 

 

World's Oldest Man Shares Diet Advice

September 25, 2009
blog photo

Click here to read a USA Today article about the world's oldest man.  He follows some of the basic advice we have been promoting for years:  eat less, and include plenty of fruit!  Also note the last line in the article:  His favorite lunch is liver and onions.  Liver contains essential fatty acids and fat soluble vitamins that are sparce in our food supply.  Always eat liver from organic free-range sources. 

Enjoy!

Take a pill or eat fruit?

September 1, 2009

Much is made of free radicals and antioxidants these days, and with good reason. Perhaps one of the greatest battles in the health-disease continuum is that between free radicals and antioxidants. Tipping the scale in our favor will promote longer life and better health.

A free radical is a molecule with one unpaired electron that carries a single positive charge. Free radicals are what cause your car’s body to rust. In the human body, these same free radicals cause tissue damage and aging. And that single positive charge gets passed domino-like through each molecule the free radical contacts in the body. 

Cigarette smoking, stress, chemical exposure, injuries, and sun exposure are all sources of free radicals.

Antioxidants neutralize that single positive charge and thus stop the “domino fall” of tissue damage. Vitamin C, vitamin, E, selenium, bioflavonoids, and polyphenols are all examples of antioxidants. 

As a general rule, the more antioxidants you have in your body, the healthier you are. In fact, a large British study in 2008 found that people with high blood levels of vitamin C lived four years longer than those with low levels.

Not surprisingly, antioxidant supplements are big business. From vitamin C to whole foods-based products (fruit and vegetable juices and powders), antioxidant products are widely available. The question is, Are these products effective and worth the price?

I’m not going to name products, because I’m not trying to endorse or condemn any one in particular. They will generally contribute to better health, all other things considered. I take a supplement myself, even though I eat lots of antioxidant-rich foods. 

 I’m aware of some powdered drinks that provide a whopping 15,000 – 20,000 ORAC units, a measure of antioxidant capacity, for about $8.00 per serving. This works out to 40 cents per 1,000 units. Can we do better with pure foods? 

 The USDA lists ORAC values for hundreds of foods. Wild blueberries provide about 6,500 ORAC units per 3.5 ounces. I can buy frozen wild blueberries at the store year-round for $4.00 per pound, making the cost per 1,000 units a little more than 13 cents! That’s one-third the cost of the supplement.

 Fresh raw currents have almost 8,000 ORAC units per 3.5 ounce serving. While the USDA does not list the ORAC value of dried currents, drying tends to triple ORAC values. Dried currents are $4.50 per pound locally. Assuming a tripling of antioxidant concentration, the cost per 1,000 ORAC units of dried currants is just four cents. 

Using similar logic, and the ORAC values of dark chocolate and fresh cherries, I come up with a real treat. Chocolate covered dried cherries at a local health food store are $16.99 per pound. Their ORAC value per 3.5 ounces is about 12,000, making the cost per 1,000 units just over 30 cents. Granted this is more than dried currants or frozen blueberries, but it’s cheaper than the supplement powder. And, it puts a smile on your face to think about taking your medicine!

 Now I’m not suggesting that we all live on dark chocolate and fruit. (Though I could suggest worse things!) A variety of fresh fruits and vegetables, plus healthy fats and proteins, are crucial to good health. Berries, artichokes, black beans, tree nuts, artichokes, and culinary herbs and spices are loaded with life-extending antioxidants. Load your diet with them, and you will enjoy optimal health reduce your need for expensive supplements.

 

Children need vitamin D

August 15, 2009

A recent survey of American adolescents revealed that fully 70% are deficient in vitamin D.  Vitamin D is critical for bone growth and proper immune function.  Low levels of vitamin D can cause the bone disease Ricketts in children, and is associated with increased incidence of cancer and heart disease in adults. 

The current study also finds strong links in children between low vitamin D levels and both high blood pressure and diabetes. 

Your body can make vitamin D when your skin is exposed to sunlight.  Fifteen - twenty minutes of sun exposure per day in light clothing is adequate, and puts you at little risk for sun damage.  You can also get vitamin D from oily fish like sardines, mackerel and herring, and from liver.  Mushrooms are a good vegetarian source which ave a multitude of other health-enhancing benefits.  (Mushrooms are nowhere near as rich a source of vitamin D as oily fish and liver, however.)

We routinely recommend cod liver oil for adults and children.  Cod liver oil from a quality manufacturer like Carlson's or Nordic Naturals is a great source f vitamin D andomega-3 essential fatty acids.  It should e viewed as a regular component of a healthy diet.  In adults we recommend 2,000 - 4,000 mg per day with food, and in children 1,000 - 4,000 mg per day depending on individual circumstances.

Eat less and live longer?

August 1, 2009

Consuming fewer calories can lead to a longer, healthier life, according to scientists studying the effect of diet on ageing in monkeys.

During the 20-year study on a group of rhesus monkeys, they found that those on normal diets were three times more likely to develop an age-related disease such as cancer, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease than those on restricted diets.

Previous studies have shown ageing can be slowed in mammals by a calorie-restricted diet or exercise, but the primate study is likely to provide better insight into the potential effects on human beings.

The scientists also found evidence that the brain health of animals on a restricted diet was better, particularly the regions associated with motor skills, memory and problem-solving.

Richard Weindruch, a professor of medicine at the University of Wisconsin-Madison school of medicine and public health, said: "We have been able to show that calorific restriction can slow the ageing process in a primate species. We observed that calorific restriction reduced the risk of developing an age-related disease by a factor of three and increased survival."

By the end of the study half of the animals permitted to eat as much as they liked had died, while only 20% of the monkeys given a third less calories each day had died.

The incidence of cancer and cardiovascular disease of those on restricted diets was less than half of that seen in the control group. Diabetes or impaired glucose regulation, common in monkeys allowed to eat all they want, did not appear at all in the other group. The scientists, who published their findings in the journal Science, also found that a restricted diet appeared to have an effect on brain health.

Sterling Johnson, a neuroscientist and co-author of the report, said: "It seems to preserve the volume of the brain in some regions. Both motor speed and mental speed slow down with ageing. Those are the areas which we found to better preserved. We can't yet make the claim that a difference in diet is associated with functional change because those studies are still ongoing. What we know so far is that there are regional differences in brain mass that appear to be related to diet."

The study, funded by the National Institute on Aging, began in 1989 with a group of 30 monkeys, with a further 45 added in 1994. Today, 33 animals remain in the study: 13 on a normal diet, 20 restricted.

When allowed to feed freely the average calorie intake of the rhesus macaques was 640 calories, while those on the diet were allowed an average of 480 calories.